* For non-USA customers:
The displayed shipping charge may be slightly exaggerated. You will receive a refund if overcharged.
After we first announced the publication of Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira: Prophet of the Reign of Mary by Roberto de Mattei, we received an email from a priest of the Society of St. Pius X, mentioned in a previous article. His email referred to a disagreement that Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer had with Dr. Corrêa de Oliveira, after having supported his work for more than four decades. The reasons behind this disagreement are also those of some members of the FSSPX, and therefore we can better understand them by turning to Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais of the FSSPX, who wrote two articles for The Angelus on Catholic Action. The second article, of October 2011, began with the suggestion that Bishop de Castro Mayer interpreted the lay apostolate of Catholic Action in a certain way to counter “deviations of the TFP.” However, Roberto de Mattei, in his earlier work Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira: Crusader of the 20th Century, points out that when Dr. Corrêa de Oliveira and members of the TFP went to Rome during the first session of the Council, where they assisted Archbishop Lefebvre, Bishop de Castro Mayer, and other like-minded bishops, they shipped trunks of literature by sea, and in particular Bishop de Castro Mayer’s 1953 Pastoral Letter on Problems of the Modern Apostolate, and Dr. Plinio’s book Revolution and Counter-Revolution.
The doctrinal position that Bishop de Castro Mayer took in that pastoral letter was identical to that of Dr. Plinio. The disagreement only came later. To understand how the disagreement developed, and in the context of the articles of Bishop Tissier to Mallerais, we must focus on the very different circumstances that the Church faced in Bishop Tissier de Mallerais’ native France, on one hand, and in Brazil, on the other hand. French Catholics had become divided over the condemnation of the movement Action Française by Pope Pius XI, the same pope who introduced the specific form of Catholic Action that Bishop Tissier de Mallerais was critically analyzing. Some saw Pius XI’s Catholic Action as being at odds with what they believed was a more Catholic political orientation within the ranks of Action Française.
Both Canon de Castro Mayer, as Vicar General of the archdiocese of São Paulo and General Assistant of Catholic Action, and Dr. Plinio, as the lay head of Catholic Action in the archdiocese, exercised their functions in full harmony with the doctrine of Catholic Action being taught by Pius XI at the time. But Dr. Plinio saw that progressive Catholics were introducing ideas into Catholic Action that were incompatible with traditional Catholic teaching, and he confronted those errors in his 1943 book In Defense of Catholic Action, with the full support of Canon de Castro Mayer. In this respect the Brazilian traditionalists shared some of the same concerns as French traditionalist Catholics, but they approached the crisis in a very different way.
One of the fundamental errors that progressives were introducing into Catholic Action in Brazil was the blurring of the distinction between the priesthood and the laity. For this reason Dr. Plinio’s book was not only a defense of the lay apostolate according to the mind of the Church, but also a defense of the priesthood and the hierarchical nature of the Church. Related to this error, which the book refuted, was another error that advocated a false understanding of the liturgy and general Catholic piety. It promoted an attitude that Dr. Plinio referred to as “liturgism,” the thinking that mere participation in the liturgy was sufficient for progress in the spiritual life, and that traditional practices of asceticism, and various private devotions, were no longer necessary.
Even though Dr. Plinio’s book was published with a preface by the papal nuncio to Brazil, it met with opposition from some of the Brazilian bishops. When he and his associates were accused of opposing episcopal authority as a result, it was Canon de Castro Mayer who came to their defense, by pointing out that bishops acting individually are not infallible. But that did not stop the opposition from gaining momentum, and soon both Canon de Castro Mayer and Dr. Plinio were removed from their positions in Catholic Action. It was a temporary setback for the traditional Catholics in Brazil. However, the Vatican Secretariat of State sent a letter praising Dr. Plinio’s book. Canon de Castro Mayer, along with another priest closely associated with them in the controversy, Father Geraldo de Proença Sigaud, were both made bishops by Pope Pius XII. Furthermore, Pius XII issued his encyclical Mediator Dei, containing points of doctrine that clearly vindicated the positions taken by Dr. Plinio in his book, and Pius XII also issued the apostolic constitution Bis Saeculari, on Catholic Action and the Sodalities of Our Lady, further strengthening the position that had been taken by the two new Brazilian bishops and Dr. Plinio.
On these points of doctrine, Bishop de Castro Mayer and Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira were completely in agreement. And their collaboration was so manifest during the Second Vatican Council, where they worked together to defend traditional doctrine against the influences of the new theology, that Archbishop Lefebvre in one of his books, They Have Uncrowned Him, acknowledged the assistance that the traditionalist bishops had received from the TFP. How then did a dispute arise a decade and a half later, between some members of the traditionalist clergy and the TFP, that led Bishop de Castro Mayer to end his support for Dr. Corrêa de Oliveira? The answer lies in the development of their understanding of a point of Catholic doctrine on which they had essentially agreed. Pius XII’s encyclical Mediator Dei emphasized the central importance of the Church’s liturgy in the spiritual lives of Catholics. At the same time he opposed the misconception that would reduce this spiritual life to the mere physical participation in the Mass and in the reception of the Sacraments. The spiritual lives of Catholics require the full living of the Catholic life, with other practices of piety and asceticism, and the fulfillment of the duties of one’s state in life.
From these two principles – the importance of liturgical practices on one hand, and the practice of other works of piety and asceticism – two distinct schools of spirituality developed among traditionalist Catholics through the course of the present crisis. The first was a priestly spirituality, led by the Society of St. Pius X, which emphasizes that all graces depend upon the Sacrifice of the Mass, as offered by the priest. The second was what Roberto de Mattei, in Part II of his book, calls the “Spiritual School” of Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira, a spirituality proper to the laymen who work to defend a sacral Christian Civilization, as defined by the Popes of Catholic Action from St. Pius X to Pius XII. The school of spirituality represented by Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira is the subject not only of Part II specifically, but of the entire book, a spirituality which at times has been the object of suspicion among certain members of the traditionalist clergy, leading some to doubt the orthodoxy of Dr. Plinio and the TFP that he founded. Prof. de Mattei’s comprehensive treatment, however, puts these fears to rest, for the book fully accomplishes the goal that the author set out to achieve – that of showing that Dr. Plinio’s life and work represented a total devotion to and defense of Catholic Tradition.
2019 xii 334 pages / sewn hardback $20.00 #55068
The Argentine Catholic news agency AICA/InfoCatólica posted a headline on July 24 reading: “Condolences of the Pope on the death of Bishop Juan Rodolfo Laise, OFMCap.” The article is especially significant because of its final paragraph on Bishop Laise’s book Communion in the Hand: Documents and History. But we present here the full context of the article, in order to illustrate why Bishop Athanasius Schneider described Bishop Laise as “the prophetic voice of an elderly bishop,” and “the glory of the bishops of Argentina” (“decus episcoporum Argentinae”).
The article began as follows:
Pope Francis sent his condolences on the death of Bishop Juan Rodolfo Laise OFMCap, Bishop Emeritus of San Luis, which occurred on Monday, July 22, in San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
The telegram with the condolences of the pontiff was sent by the Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, to the current bishop of San Luis, Bishop Pedro Daniel Martínez Perea, through the apostolic nunciature.
The AICA report continued by stating that the Argentine Episcopal Conference used Twitter to express “its sorrow and firm hope in the Risen Lord” on learning the news of Bishop Laise’s death. AICA then cited the words spoken at Bishop Laise’s funeral in Italy by Archbishop Franco Moscone of Manfredonia-Vieste–San Giovanni Rotondo, who named seven “calls” that Bishop Laise received during the course of his life: his birth whereby he was made in the image of God, his baptism making him a son of God, his call to the religious life making him a son of Saint Francis, his fourth call to the priesthood, his fifth call as a bishop and successor of the Apostles, a sixth call as a confessor like St. Padre Pio, and his seventh call to eternal life.
Adding to the memories of him from his fellow bishops is a pastoral letter cited by AICA, and written by Bishop Laise’s current successor, Bishop Pedro Daniel Martínez Perea. AICA cites Bishop Martínez Perea as follows:
“We especially value, among other activities, his love for the Eucharist, his Marian devotion, realized in each town; his ecclesial concern for vocations, embodied in the founding of the Saint Michael the Archangel Diocesan Major Seminary; and his fidelity to the Catholic doctrine of the Magisterium of the Church,” he said.
Likewise, he emphasized “his constant efforts to maintain and highlight the sacredness of the liturgy, restoring the cathedral church and promoting sacred chant; his solicitude for Catholic education; his particular devotion to Padre Pio, with the creation of prayer groups.”
The AICA article concludes under a subtitle referring to his “exquisite care for the sacraments.”
Bishop Laise was born in the city of Buenos Aires on February 22, 1926. He made the solemn profession in the Franciscan Order of the Capuchin Friars Minor on March 13, 1949, and was ordained a priest in the Euskal Echea de Llavallol School chapel, Province of Buenos Aires, on September 4 of that year by Bishop Miguel de Andrea, titular bishop of Temnos.
On July 6, 1971, he became the fourth bishop of San Luis, a diocese that had been created in 1934 by Pope Pius XI, succeeding Bishop Carlos María Cafferata.
Based in Italy, his retirement years were spent in the Shrine of San Giovanni Rotondo, known for being the monastery where Saint Padre Pio de Pietralcina lived throughout his life. There each day he served for one of the four periods for confession, arranged to attend the many pilgrims who arrive there….
Among his many works, outstanding is his book Communion in the Hand: Documents and History, originally published in 1997, where he explains the reverence that each of the faithful must give to the Blessed Sacrament when they receive Communion. With irrefutable proof he concludes that the only way to manifest sincerely with word and gestures the faith in the Eucharistic presence of the Lord is to receive Communion on the tongue, directly from the hands of the priest. In fact, in his diocese it was forbidden to receive Communion otherwise.
The wording of this final paragraph was taken from the web site of the Argentine Una Voce, an association which is especially qualified to describe Bishop Laise’s work in defense of the traditional rites of the Church. The original title of his book was the one cited above: Communion in the Hand: Documents and History. But in the final year before his death Bishop Laise added another section to the book, expanding his defense of the reverence due to the Holy Eucharist. He gave the book a new title, Holy Communion, with the original title and the new section title as subtitles. The book in its original form focused on the external respect required to receive Communion, and the defense of the Church’s liturgical laws making Communion on the tongue the norm for the universal Church. But the new section added by Bishop Laise is devoted to the interior dispositions required for receiving Communion, and to this new part of the book His Excellency gave the title: Some Reflections on Spiritual Communion and the State of Grace. God’s mercy toward those who fall into sin can never be interpreted as permitting Communion when someone is not observing the Commandments. The laws of God do not represent an unachievable burden, but a necessary guide to enable the faithful to receive Communion worthily. Both in the external rite whereby the faithful receive Communion on the tongue, and not in the hand, and in one’s internal dispositions requiring not merely the state of grace but a fruitful preparation, Bishop Laise affirmed the constant teaching and practice of the Church, which have guided Catholic piety throughout all the centuries of the Church’s history.
By Bishop Juan Rodolfo Laise, OFMCap
Preface by Bishop Athanasius Schneider
2018 218 pages hardcover $18.00 #63233
Recently I learned about the release of the Catholic Bibliographical Index by Preserving Christian Publications. My experience in research and in teaching led me to recognize quickly and without
When the Holy See published the Third Secret of Fatima on June 26, 2000, many became skeptical. The Secret was a simple vision described by Sister Lucia, analogous to the parables of the Gospel used by Our Lord to communicate the profound truths of Revelation, and yet it was thought to be ambiguous by some. Biblical Symbolism and the Third Secret of Fatima
30 Years' Experience of an Exorcist Told In His Own Words–Sequel to "Begone Satan" [1. possession in general & its characteristics; 2. confessions made by demons; 3. victim souls & the role of Our Lady in crushing the demons] Anonymous [an exorcist: died Nov 5, 1909] / Rev Theodore Geiger, ed / Rev Celestine Kapsner, OSB, tr.
Two Great Books One Low Price. Liber Brevior and Holy Week Chant. Save $10! The size, cover texture and red edges match the original Liber Brevior. Add the HOLY WEEK book and save big!. #89062 Monks of Solesmes / PCP
Dictionary of the Psalter, A: Containing the Vocabulary of the Psalms, Hymns, Canticles, & Miscellaneous Prayers of the Breviary Psalter [based on the Latin Vulgate Psalter with English definitions & explanations] Britt, Dom Matthew, OSB, ed & intro by / Rt Rev John B. Petersen, preface by
Theory of Evolution Judged by Reason and Faith, The [how evolution applied to living beings has no scientific basis, & as applied to man cannot be admitted] Ruffini, Ernesto Cardinal / Fr Francis O'Hanlon, tr / Archbp Thomas Boland, foreword by
Based on the Caeremoniale Episcoporum, Decrees of the Sacred Congregation of Rites and Approved Authors 2 volumes in 1 by Rt Rev. Aurelius Stehle, OSB Revised by Father Emmeran A. Rettger. OSB, MA Rt Rev. Aurelius Stehle, OSB, Revised by Father Emmeran A. Rettger. OSB, MA
". . . is a worthy edition of an important Catholic work. I am most grateful to have a copy of the book.”His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke Reply to Anglican theologian, Hardback with Dust Jacket, 2012 xvi 129p + 15p appendix $16 Merry del Val, Rafael Cardinal
Roman Ritual, The [Rituale Romanum]: In Latin & English With Rubrics & Plainchant Notation [vol 1: The Sacraments & Processions; vol 2: Christian Burial, Exorcism, Reserved Blessings, etc.; vol 3: The Blessings] [in 3 vols] Weller, Fr Philip T.